Our mission: to enlighten and to entertain

The Griffin

‘Stranger Things’ flops

Reproduced by permission of netflix

Reproduced by permission of netflix

Audrey Houghton, Staff writer

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on RedditPin on PinterestPrint this page

The Netflix series “Stranger Things,” released July 15, is taking the world by storm. This is confusing, considering the show is jam-packed with gaping plot holes, average acting and over-complicated story lines. 

The main characters include four bookish Indiana boys and a girl with supernatural powers, Eleven, whom they hide in their basement in an E.T.-esque fashion. The acting is average with the exception of Winona Rider, who convincingly portrays a frantic mother consumed by the disappearance of her son. The adolescent characters in the show harbor mediocre acting skills and often have odd personalities that make me cringe. This can be noticed in Jonathan Byers, a loner with a creepy interest in photographing people. His stalker-like energy in the show makes me feel uncomfortable. 

Described as horror-fiction, the show heavily resembles director Steven Spielberg’s “Poltergeist.” Most supernatural aspects of “Stranger Things” are derived from “Poltergeist,” and this absence of originality causes me to feel bored while watching the show. If the goal of “Stranger Things” is to frighten the audience like “Poltergeist,” they are unsuccessful. In fact, this series does not scare me at all, which is disappointing. Supernatural occurrences in the series are often too unrealistic to find scary and the eerie energy built up throughout does not cause alarm.

The plot is incredibly complicated as well. I do think that complexity in a show can be a good thing but not to the point where I don’t know what’s going on. Normally I can multi-task while watching a series, but I find this to be difficult. I do not recommend this show to anyone that has a hard time focusing. If I get up to snack or check my phone, I miss something important and have to rewind. Time and energy spent rewinding this show can be spent on more important things, like not watching it at all. 

The series is also filled with copious amounts of plot holes. As an example, a beloved character, Barb, disappears one night, similarly to a disappearance earlier in the series. Her absence is briefly mentioned the next day by her best friend and main character, Nancy, but no one searches for Barb and she is never mentioned again in the series.

The series finale is a bore and way too predictable. I am not impressed and I do not want more. The series is over hyped, and I doubt that the next season will be as popular.

Stars: 2/5

See Editor-in-chief Grace Knotts’ review on “Stranger Things” for a different perspective.

Print Friendly

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Features

    Scenes from Science Day

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Features

    Sheeran’s sound proves generic

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Features

    Classic perseveres as a favorite

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Reviews

    Prequel fails to fulfill expectations

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Reviews

    Novella’s Controversial Theme Satisfies

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Features

    Country Album Stays True to Roots

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Reviews

    ‘DAMN.’ disappoints

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Features

    Senior Centerfold: Stephan Ervin

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Features

    Senior Centerfold: Collin Stiers

  • ‘Stranger Things’ flops

    Features

    Senior Centerfold: Shreeyad Pant